UNCOUNTED: AN EXPLOSIVE NEW DOCUMENTARY ON ELECTION
FRAUD
Stolen Election Video
This video is a compilation of images and sounds starting with the flawed
2004 election up through the Congressional challenge of Ohio's electoral
votes. Please consider posting it on your site or sharing it with your
friends and family.
Real Media 256k stream:
http://veredictum.com/stolenelection2004-256.ram
Real Media 56k stream
(for dial-up):
http://veredictum.com/stolenelection2004-56.rm
Harvey
Wasserman on New Ohio Voting Report: "The 2004 Election
Was Stolen… Finally We Have Irrefutable Confirmation"
Ohio Destroyed
Or Lost 2/3 of 2004 Presidential Elections
Counterpunch Magazine:
Mexico's Surreal Elections-
Anatomy of a Fraud Foretold
Voter Fraud Roundup
WILL THE MAJOR MEDIA FINALLY COVER THE ELECTRONIC ELECTION FRAUD ISSUE
Mark
Crispin Miller: “Kerry Told Me He Now Thinks the Election
Was Stolen”
Election
Fraud Continues in the US -
New Data Shows Widespread Vote Manipulations in 2004
FOCUS: MSNBC Vote Fraud Video (Must See)
More Compelling
Evidence Regarding 2004 Presidential Election Fraud
Let The truth Be Known - Here it is in red, white and blue... These graphs tell the whole picture...
Presidential
Election Voter fraud Part 3
QUANTUM PHYSICS
LOOKS AT THE 2004 ELECTION: Did Bush win the election or did he steal
it?
Sample Letter to Senator or Congressperson
Hyping
Terror
Challenge the Vote
Great Opportunity
To Be Pro-Active Regarding Voter fraud.
Conyers to Object
20 Amazing
Facts About Voting in the USA
Mark Crispin
Miller: Definitive Analysis Of Latest Stolen Election
TV Networks
Officially Refuse to Release Exit Poll Raw Data By Gary Beckwith
Something
BIG is about to happen (about Voter Fraud) by Gary Beckwith
The
silent scream of numbers
The 2004 election was stolen will someone please tell the media?
Definitive Material On Voter Fraud In Regards To ElectronicVoting:
For a powerful, reliable 10-page summary of the elections cover-up,
go at
http://www.wanttoknow.info/electionsmanipulations
For astonishing facts on who counts your vote: http://www.WantToKnow.info/votingproblems
For more on elections cover-ups and what you can do:
Elections Information Center
http://www.WantToKnow.info/electionsinformation
http://www.WantToKnow.info/electionscoverups
Elections Cover-up
A Two-Page Summary of Revealing Media Reports With Links
The concise excerpts from media articles below reveal major problems
with the elections process.
Spread the word and be sure to vote.
CNN News, 9/20/06, Voting Machines Put U.S. Democracy at Risk
http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/09/19/Dobbs.Sept20
really be sure the votes will be counted correctly?
A 2005 Government Accountability Office report on electronic
voting confirmed the worst fears:
"There is evidence that
some of these concerns have been realized and have caused problems
with
recent elections, resulting in the loss and miscount of
votes."
New York Times, 9/5/06, In Search of Accurate Vote Totals
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/05/opinion/05tue1.html
?ex=1315108800&en=c0560775e07d9ee0&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
A recent government report details enormous flaws in the election
system in Ohio's biggest county,
problems that may not be fixable
before the 2008 election.
MSNBC/Associated Press, 9/13/06, Princeton Prof Hacks E-vote
Machine
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/14825465/
A Princeton University computer science professor added new fuel...to
claims that electronic
voting machines...are vulnerable to hacking.
USA Today/Associated Press, 7/13/06, Electronic Voting Machines
Under Legal Attack
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-07-13-evoting_x.htm
Lawsuits have been filed in at least nine states, alleging that
the machines are wide open to computer hackers.
Washington Post, 6/28/06, A Single Person Could Swing an Election
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/27/AR2006062701451.html
A team of cybersecurity experts [concluded] that it would take
only one person, with a sophisticated technical
knowledge and timely
access to the software that runs the voting machines, to change
the [election] outcome.
New York Times, 5/30/06, Block the Vote
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/30/opinion/30tue1.html
?ex=1306641600&en=4eafe18972bb6a8a&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
States are adopting rules that make it hard, and financially
perilous, for nonpartisan groups to register new voters.
New rules
for maintaining voter rolls...are likely to throw off many eligible
voters.
Newsweek, 5/29/06, Will Your Vote Count in 2006?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12888600/site/newsweek
A report by Finnish security expert Harri Hursti analyzed Diebold
voting machines [and] found unheralded
vulnerabilities. .
Wall Street Journal, 5/12/06, Reversing Course on Electronic Voting
http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB114739688261250925
-q5rh2ocioxu6mgjmS6bZPCZL0HY_20060610.html
Some advocates of a 2002 law mandating upgrades of the nation's
voting machinery now worry the overhaul is
making things worse.
New York Times, 5/12/06, New Fears of Security Risks in Electronic
Voting Systems
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/12/us/12vote.html
?ex=1305086400&en=5b3554a76aad524a&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
Officials in Pennsylvania and California issued urgent directives...about
a potential security risk in their Diebold
Election Systems touch-screen
voting machines. "It's the most severe security flaw ever
discovered
in a voting system," said Michael I. Shamos, a professor of
computer science at Carnegie Mellon.
Washington Post, 3/26/06, Election Whistle-Blower Stymied by
Vendors
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/25/AR2006032500805.html
Ion Sancho is...elections supervisor in Leon County, Fla. Last
year, [he] helped show that electronic
voting machines...would
allow election workers to alter vote counts without detection.
Times, 9/12/04, On the Voting Machine Makers' Tab
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/12/opinion/12sun2.html
?ex=1252728000&en=dda9313c18e02663&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland
Some of electronic voting's loudest defenders have been state
and local election officials.
Many of those same officials have
financial ties to voting machine companies.
MSNBC/AP, 8/23/04, Secretive Testing Firms Certify Nation's Vote
Count Machines
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5762054/from/RL.4
The three companies that certify the nation's voting technologies
operate in secrecy, and refuse
to
discuss flaws in the machines.
Federal regulators have virtually no oversight over testing of
the technology.
New York Times, 1/31/04, How to Hack an Election
http://www.WantToKnow.info/040131nytimes
|
